Skip to main content

The Lazy Way to Become an Olympic Athlete

Great story over at the lazy way to success.

Eric Moussambani finished to a sincerely-given standing ovation and I got goose bumps. His time was one minute and 52.72 seconds.
...
After I watched his painful performance, I realized that Eric Moussambani had just given me a chance to redeem myself. Even though I couldn’t come close to competing with the women’s gold medalist in the 400, I knew I had a fighting chance to beat Eric Moussambani in the 100 free.
...
I touched the wall at the end of the seventh lap and turned off my watch. Merciful God, I beat Moussambani’s time by over fifteen seconds! I had been reprieved!
...
Epilogue: I have since stopped timing myself. It was making the idea of swimming down right unpleasant. These days, I am back to leisurely paddling back and forth, content to know that I am good enough to be an Olympic swimmer. All I have to do is move to Equatorial Guinea.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Requegesis

Requegesis is the critical interpretation of requirements. It’s at the same time an art and methodical approach to understand history, origin, background (also cultural), criticality and validity of requirements. The goal of requegesis is to find the best functional response to requirements while taking liberty in their interpretation. The word “requegesis” itself is a portmanteau - a linguistic blend - of the two words “requirement” and “exegesis”. The first part of the word “requ” is used in the traditional sense of the " singular documented physical and functional need that a particular design, product or process must be able to perform ". The second part of the word exegesis (from the greek “to lead out”) is the “ critical explanation or interpretation of a text, particularly a religious text. “ I think exegesis with the connotation of being used for religious texts underlines the way some requirements being treated as sacrosanct rather than critically interpreted ...

The seduction of "good enough"

Seth Godin once again speaks from my heart. I think that good enough is far away from being sufficient anymore. Think about common household goods: The current business plan for creators of measuring cups and other household items is: cheap, one size fits all and throw away in two years to buy again. I recently was at the local IKEA to buy a new measuring jug, but they only had cups with metric and imperial measurement system - and none of them were made of glass, all plastic. I don't want another measuring systems on my cup. This may sound narrow-minded, but I regard those different systems utterly confusing - especially when I'm cooking. I addition, the letters on these plastic cups vanish after a year or two. I went and ordered a glass measuring jug , made from Jena glass in Germany. It wasn't expensive. And it feels light and solid. It's made in Europe. It only has metric marks on it. It will be good for a lifetime. That's a product, that can't be made any b...

Why did Microsoft cripple Groove?

I'm currently trying to use Microsoft Groove 2007 as a collaboration tool to gather requirements. What I like about tools like Groove is: - You can open and edit an entry without having to start an additional application (like word, excel) - You can copy and paste pictures (screenshots) directly into an entry - You don't have to save and re-attach changed files - You can work offline - Groove works inside and outside of our network out-of-the-box - We have (as a Microsoft Gold Partner) 100 licenses available What I don't understand about the current offering is that a lot of tools available in the last version have been removed: The following tools and toolsets are no longer available for adding to new or existing workspaces : Contact Manager, Discussion, Document Review, Outliner , Task Manager, Text, Tic- Tac -Toe, Web Links, Welcome Page, Advanced Project Toolset , and Mobile Workspace for SharePoint . (Source: Microsoft Office Groove Help) There is also a large set ...