Skip to main content

Why did Microsoft cripple Groove?

I'm currently trying to use Microsoft Groove 2007 as a collaboration tool to gather requirements. What I like about tools like Groove is:

- You can open and edit an entry without having to start an additional application (like word, excel)
- You can copy and paste pictures (screenshots) directly into an entry
- You don't have to save and re-attach changed files
- You can work offline
- Groove works inside and outside of our network out-of-the-box
- We have (as a Microsoft Gold Partner) 100 licenses available

What I don't understand about the current offering is that a lot of tools available in the last version have been removed:

The following tools and toolsets are no longer available for adding to new or existing workspaces: Contact Manager, Discussion, Document Review, Outliner, Task Manager, Text, Tic-Tac-Toe, Web Links, Welcome Page, Advanced Project Toolset, and Mobile Workspace for SharePoint.

(Source: Microsoft Office Groove Help)


There is also a large set of other features that have been removed:
  • Co-editing of Word documents.

  • Presenting of PowerPoint slide shows.

  • File viewers in the Groove Files Tool.

  • Outlook Calendar integration with the Groove Calendar and Groove Meetings tools.

  • Launching Netmeeting.

  • Sending an Outlook email thread to a Groove workspace.
    (Source: Microsoft Office Groove Help)


There is a button to browse online for additional tools; but the webpage you are directed to, doesn't contain any tools. Even for adding custom tools, the only option seem to be forms - but the Infopath forms integration is very limited.

Now I do understand that Microsoft wants to streamline it's offering, but this seems like crippling an existing application into oblivion. What is the problem of offering different ways to do the same thing? I see that presenting PowerPoint slide shows conflicts with Microsoft Office Live offerings - but if users already pay for a Groove license, why can't they use that feature in the application they already work in? There are also a lot of similar services available in Sharepoint; but there I need to be online (except when using Groove to sync Sharepoint files - note the irony) and I always have to start external applications to do anything. It seems to me, that Microsoft bought Groove to make it disappear.
3 comments

Popular posts from this blog

Switzerland - the country with the most craft breweries per capita

Just stumbled upon this stat:


(Source: http://www.statista.com/chart/4001/the-countries-with-the-most-craft-breweries/)

Interesting is looking at the number of capita per craft brewery - we see Switzerland has one craft brewery per 20'000 people:

CountryCraft BreweriesCapitaCapita per BreweryUSA4,000322,216,00080,554Canada48335,851,77474,227UK72364,800,00089,627Germany30781,197,500264,487France65467,107,000102,610Switzerland3968,279,70020,908Russia561146,433,580261,022Italy60060,725,000101,208Japan200126,890,000634,450Brazil217205,180,000945,530
(Source of population  data: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_and_dependencies_by_population)

Sony is evil

I just so agree with Todd:

Bad Company of the Year Award!:The company that I am putting at the top of my list is a 4 letter word so foul, that it has been banned from my home. I have asked my wife who is Japanese to refrain from buying any of their products for the next 5 years. The Bad company of the year is no other than SONY…
Sony is just a big no-buy company. My girlfriend knows why Sony is evil and we both will rather buy a more expensive or less appealing product from a competitor. "Sony is evil" has only 726 hits on Google, but this will increase.

Edit: More about the damage Sony does:
Artists revolt against DRM
Portable stereo's creator got his due, eventually

Requegesis

Requegesis is the critical interpretation of requirements. It’s at the same time an art and methodical approach to understand history, origin, background (also cultural), criticality and validity of requirements. The goal of requegesis is to find the best functional response to requirements while taking liberty in their interpretation.

The word “requegesis” itself is a portmanteau - a linguistic blend - of the two words “requirement” and “exegesis”. The first part of the word “requ” is used in the traditional sense of the "singular documented physical and functional need that a particular design, product or process must be able to perform". The second part of the word exegesis (from the greek “to lead out”) is the “critical explanation or interpretation of a text, particularly a religious text. “

I think exegesis with the connotation of being used for religious texts underlines the way some requirements being treated as sacrosanct rather than critically interpreted in the cu…