Skip to main content

Why did Microsoft cripple Groove?

I'm currently trying to use Microsoft Groove 2007 as a collaboration tool to gather requirements. What I like about tools like Groove is:

- You can open and edit an entry without having to start an additional application (like word, excel)
- You can copy and paste pictures (screenshots) directly into an entry
- You don't have to save and re-attach changed files
- You can work offline
- Groove works inside and outside of our network out-of-the-box
- We have (as a Microsoft Gold Partner) 100 licenses available

What I don't understand about the current offering is that a lot of tools available in the last version have been removed:

The following tools and toolsets are no longer available for adding to new or existing workspaces: Contact Manager, Discussion, Document Review, Outliner, Task Manager, Text, Tic-Tac-Toe, Web Links, Welcome Page, Advanced Project Toolset, and Mobile Workspace for SharePoint.

(Source: Microsoft Office Groove Help)


There is also a large set of other features that have been removed:
  • Co-editing of Word documents.

  • Presenting of PowerPoint slide shows.

  • File viewers in the Groove Files Tool.

  • Outlook Calendar integration with the Groove Calendar and Groove Meetings tools.

  • Launching Netmeeting.

  • Sending an Outlook email thread to a Groove workspace.
    (Source: Microsoft Office Groove Help)


There is a button to browse online for additional tools; but the webpage you are directed to, doesn't contain any tools. Even for adding custom tools, the only option seem to be forms - but the Infopath forms integration is very limited.

Now I do understand that Microsoft wants to streamline it's offering, but this seems like crippling an existing application into oblivion. What is the problem of offering different ways to do the same thing? I see that presenting PowerPoint slide shows conflicts with Microsoft Office Live offerings - but if users already pay for a Groove license, why can't they use that feature in the application they already work in? There are also a lot of similar services available in Sharepoint; but there I need to be online (except when using Groove to sync Sharepoint files - note the irony) and I always have to start external applications to do anything. It seems to me, that Microsoft bought Groove to make it disappear.

Comments

Unknown said…
Assigning Groove into oblivion is slightly premature. Whereas the comparatively small community of older versions of Groove see that some features are gone, people new to the Groove experience have a completely different experience. For the majority of email addicted users, the initial reaction is one of awe. To keep track of what is happening in the Groove community, allow me to plug the Groove User Group, http://grooveuser.org and the Groove Advisor, edited by Abbott Lowell, http://blogs.technet.com/groove
Anonymous said…
I used Groove before it was bought by Microsoft. I agree with the Original posting. It seems nothing much has been added, but a lot has been taken away. It has been a while now since it was integrated into Microsoft Office, and no updates have come out and nothing has changed. I think Microsoft are missing a big trick, and have done a disservice for a whole lot of previously happy Groove Users.

I check out the blogs from previous post. They are not much use: Hardly any users, no downloads at all available (despite "Downloads" being one of the four main navigation tabs).
Alex Boyd said…
Groove has turned from a fantastic synchronization product into a piece of trash. Not to mention, they've raised the price for about NIL additional features. And, if that's not enough, they don't offer support like the original Groove team did, at least, not without paying something like $99 for email support and $259 for phone support. Groove, I respected you. Microsoft, I hated you. Now, it's the latter for both.

Ok, I'm through ranting, for now. Microsoft will one day crash as a company, and only then will they realize their arrogance.

Popular posts from this blog

Sony is evil

I just so agree with Todd: Bad Company of the Year Award! : The company that I am putting at the top of my list is a 4 letter word so foul, that it has been banned from my home. I have asked my wife who is Japanese to refrain from buying any of their products for the next 5 years. The Bad company of the year is no other than SONY… Sony is just a big no-buy company. My girlfriend knows why Sony is evil and we both will rather buy a more expensive or less appealing product from a competitor. " Sony is evil " has only 726 hits on Google, but this will increase. Edit: More about the damage Sony does: Artists revolt against DRM Portable stereo's creator got his due, eventually

Two factor authentication outdated?

According to the article below from The Register (quoting Bruce Schneier), two-factor authentication seems already be outdated. I believe, we should take a careful approach here: Two-factor authentication is certainly better than just user-id and password. Especially online banking in the US has been using just user-id/password and now they are paying the prize for this lax security measure. Stepping up to use onetime passwords (such as RSA SecurID or Aladin tokens) is a first step against sniffing out passwords. However, there is no such thing as complete security. But two-factor authentication is a first step. As every Information Security Officer nows, user awareness is key to increase security. By giving user a device, this awareness increases dramatically. Link to original article. New threats need new response Banks are spending millions on two-factor authentication for their customers but the approach no longer provides adequate protection against fraud or identity theft, accord